When I popped a few notes into a card for my niece this Christmas I made sure the notes were new and crisp, rather
than crumpled grubby ones.
Why should that matter, I wondered.
Surely a tenner is still worth ten pounds, whether the note is
freshly minted or has been through a hundred hands. Or is it? New research from the University of Guelph** shows that
not all notes are created equal, and we’ll cherish new ones over grubby ones
any time.
I wouldn’t give my niece a dirty note just as I wouldn’t give her a pair of pre-worn socks. |
In five different studies, the Guelph researchers
gave people old or new notes to spend (bet they didn’t
have trouble finding participants for that study). People spent
more and took more chances with older, worn money. Each time the same main
reason emerged: people don’t like "dirty money."
Apparently it's the 'ick' factor: the idea of touching something that others have handled. People want to rid themselves of worn currency, fearing the contamination from others.
People value a crisp new note because they
take pride in it, almost viewing it as a reflection of themselves. So, when spending
around others, we are more likely to hand over our new-looking currency,
even if we have to use four £5 notes rather than one crumpled £20 note. It's about social currency. If the transaction has no social value you'll get rid of your
old notes. But when spending (or giving) to impress you want your notes to spell 'clean'.
I wouldn’t give my niece a dirty note just as I
wouldn’t give her a pair of pre-worn socks. This challenges the
long-held belief that we take money at face value - it’s actually subject
to the same inferences and biases as the products it can buy.
**Fabrizio Di Muro and Theodore J. Noseworthy. Money Isn’t Everything, but It Helps If It Doesn’t Look Used: How the Physical Appearance of Money Influences Spending. Journal of Consumer Research, April 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please note we do not accept comments from anonymous users.