A
friend recently confessed that she wears high heels all the time because her
husband ‘prefers them’. (So if you
thought he looked sexier in a horse-hair cod piece, he’d wear one for you would
he?) ….
Her
hubbie obviously hasn't descended down the same line as Matt Rudd who, in today’s Sunday Times, is
bewildered that women wear things that cripple them with blisters and prevent
them from running. When it comes to heels there are clearly two types of males,
those affected by lordosis and those who aren’t.
Lordosis,
I hear you cry, what the Jimmy Choo is that?
It’s an abnormal forward curvature of the spine. The position that a high heel forces the female form into, with the back arched
and the buttocks invitingly tipped up. According to the American Physical Therapy Association, “Walking in high heels forces the back to arch and the chest to thrust forward. Basically, high heels cause the neck and back to hyperextend.”
If
you’re thinking this is a load of babboon’s buttocks you’re right, it’s the
courting pose of mammals.
Helen, Fisher, author of the Biology of Attraction, says:
"Some women also have a characteristic walk when courting; they arch their backs, thrust out their bosoms, sway their hips, and strut. No wonder many women wear high-heeled shoes. This bizarre Western custom, invented by Catherine de Medici in the 1500s, unnaturally arches the back, tilts the buttocks, and thrusts the chest out into a female come-hither pose. The clomping noise of their spiky heels draws attention too."
Despite a recent finding that high heels denote emotional instability during cognitive appraisal, it seems that evolutionary psychology is alive and well and tripping down the catwalk. Or the high street.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please note we do not accept comments from anonymous users.